The escalating risks of mass biometric surveillance in the age of AI | Part 1

The escalating risks of mass biometric surveillance in the age of AI | Part 1

What’s worse than being constantly watched? Not knowing you’re being watched, or that your unique physical and biological information is being fed into a vast surveillance infrastructure that you have no control over. From ICE’s use of facial recognition on the streets in the US to Hungary identifying and tracking Pride event attendees, China’s monitoring of ethnic minorities, France normalizing mass surveillance during the Paris Olympics, and the monitoring of political dissenters in Africa, these security systems are rapidly blurring the line between targeted and mass surveillance.

Standards and Considerations for Medical Data Disclosure For Open Ethics Transparency Protocol

Standards and Considerations for Medical Data Disclosure For Open Ethics Transparency Protocol

In the context of understanding, possibly developing, and enhancing an ethical framework for healthcare applications, we face fragmented, evolving standards on medical data disclosure. In light of these significant barriers, we evaluate and discuss a proposed modular integration of legal, ethical, and technical disclosure standards (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR, Xcertia, ISO/IEEE 11073 into transparency, autonomy, and compliance processes across jurisdictions.

Self Driving Car Ethics: Beyond A Glorified Trolly Problem

Self Driving Car Ethics: Beyond A Glorified Trolly Problem

The self-driving cars ability to accurately decide on which lives to save and which to sacrifice very much depends on its ability to detect each and every one of those lives to begin with.

Is there a risk of self-driving cars identifying some pedestrians but not others? The short answer is yes, there is. While the famous philosophical dilemma, commonly known as “the trolly problem”, is not completely irrelevant, there are much bigger ethical fish to fry.